La Tecnología en la Educación a Distancia: Revisión de Progresos y Obstáculos a Superar
Palabras clave:
Educación a distancia, Tecnología educativa, Plataforma, Calidad educativaResumen
La educación a distancia ha avanzado notablemente gracias a las tecnologías, proporcionando flexibilidad y accesibilidad a nivel global. Este artículo revisa la literatura para analizar estos progresos y los desafíos persistentes, enfocándose en plataformas de aprendizaje en línea, herramientas de comunicación, recursos educativos digitales y tecnologías emergentes como la realidad aumentada, la realidad virtual y la inteligencia artificial. A pesar de los beneficios, persisten desafíos significativos, como la brecha digital y la necesidad de capacitación en competencias digitales para docentes y estudiantes. La revisión identifica estrategias para superar estos obstáculos, incluyendo políticas gubernamentales, innovaciones en el diseño instruccional y colaboración entre instituciones educativas y empresas tecnológicas. Estas colaboraciones facilitan el acceso a tecnologías avanzadas y desarrollan soluciones personalizadas que mejoran la calidad educativa. La discusión subraya la importancia de evaluar continuamente la calidad de los programas y de implementar un enfoque multifacético para garantizar el acceso equitativo y la eficacia del aprendizaje. En conclusión, aunque la educación a distancia ha progresado considerablemente, es crucial abordar los desafíos restantes mediante políticas efectivas, inversiones en infraestructura y programas de capacitación continua para maximizar su potencial y asegurar una educación inclusiva y de alta calidad.
Referencias
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.133
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. Learning Analytics, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4
Barbour, M., Labonte, R., Kelly, K., Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., & Trust, T. (2020). Understanding Pandemic Pedagogy: Differences Between Emergency Remote, Remote, and Online Teaching December 2020 A special report of the State of the Nation: K-12 E-Learning in Canada project. https://k12sotn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/understanding-pandemic-pedagogy.pdf
Bates, A. W. (Tony). (2005). Technology, e-learning and Distance Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203463772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203463772
Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented Reality in the Classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2012.111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Borgman, C. L. (2003). From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure. MIT Press.
Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User Models for Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Educational Systems. The Adaptive Web, 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1
Choez-Calderón, C. J., & Montero de la Cueva, J. V. (2022). Gestión tecnológica y mejora de la productividad en la hacienda La Perla. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 2(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v2/n2/50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v2/n2/50
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments - MindTrek ’11, 11, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Durlach, P. J., & Lesgold, A. M. (2012). Adaptive technologies for training and education. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049580
Ellis, R. (2009). Learning Management Systems. https://home.csulb.edu/~arezaei/ETEC551/web/LMS_fieldguide_20091.pdf
European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027) | European Education Area. Education.ec.europa.eu. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan
Galarza-Sánchez, P. C., Agualongo-Yazuma, J. C., & Jumbo-Martínez, M. N. (2022). Innovación tecnológica en la industria de restaurantes del Cantón Pedro Vicente Maldonado. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 2(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v2/n1/45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v2/n1/45
Garrison, D. Randy., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning. Semantic Scholar. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738.CH21
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does Gamification Work? -- a Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2014.377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Helsper, E. (2008). Digital inclusion: an analysis of social disadvantage and the information society. Www.communities.gov.uk. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/26938
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. Er.educause.edu. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
ITU. (2020). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2020. ITU. https://www.itu.int/pub/D-IND-ICT_MDD-2020
Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science : building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking Beyond Zoom: Using Asynchronous Video to Maintain Connection and Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383–391. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216192/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.70725/331114ctnutj
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed : an argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Martin, F., & Parker, M. (2014). Use of Synchronous Virtual Classrooms: Why, Who, and How? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2). https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/martin_0614.pdf
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811678
Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online : what research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095959
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies . https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02505024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Montalván-Vélez, C. L., Mogrovejo-Zambrano, J. N., Rodríguez-Andrade, A. E., & Andrade-Vaca, A. L. (2024). Adopción y Efectividad de Tecnologías Emergentes en la Educación desde una Perspectiva Administrativa y Gerencial . Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 4(1), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v4/n1/92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v4/n1/92
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Moore, M. G., & Anderson, W. G. (2003). Handbook of distance education. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education : A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12152
Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225
Reigeluth, C. M. (2013). Instructional-design Theories and Models (C. M. Reigeluth, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development.
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
Schrum, L., Burbank, M. D., Engle, J., Chambers, J. A., & Glassett, K. F. (2005). Post-secondary educators’ professional development: Investigation of an online approach to enhancing teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.08.001
Shah, D. (2020, November 30). By The Numbers: MOOCs in 2020 — Class Central. The Report by Class Central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2020/
Solano-Gutiérrez, G. A., Núñez-Freire, L. A., Mendoza-Loor, J. J., Choez-Calderón, C. J., & Montaño-Cabezas, L. J. (2023). Evolución del Computador: desde el ABC de su Arquitectura hasta la Construcción de una PC Gamer. Editorial Grupo AEA. https://doi.org/10.55813/egaea.l.2022.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55813/egaea.l.2022.24
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K–12 Blended learning. http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
Swan, K., Matthews, D., Bogle, L., Boles, E., & Day, S. (2014). Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.002
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO’s ICT Competency Framework for Teachers | UNESCO. Www.unesco.org. https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-competencies-skills/ict-cft
UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery | UNESCO. Www.unesco.org. https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-disruption-recovery
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
Wiley, D. (2014). The Access Compromise and the 5th R. Iterating toward Openness. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
Xu Xiaoli. (2017). Optimization of MOOC Based on Learning Community. 5(5), 516–519. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-5-7
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). Springeropen. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Categorías
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Gerardo Alfredo Solano-Gutiérrez (Autor/a)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Cómo citar
